Web• Tandon V Trustees of Spurgeons Homes [1982] AC 755 • Lord Roskill giving lead judgment in H/L stated the following propositions of law • “…(1) as long as a building of mixed use can reasonably be called a house, it is within the statutory definition of ‘house’ even though it WebOne of the leading House of Lords decisions was the case of Tandon v Trustees of Spurgeon Homes [ii]. The property in that case consisted of commercial premises at ground-floor level with flats above. In common-sense terms, the building was clearly not a house. The court, however, decided that the building was a house for the purposes of the ...
Grosvenor (Mayfair) Estate v Merix International... - Maitland …
WebApr 24, 2024 · Tandon v Trustees of Spurgeons Homes: HL 1982 Tenants sought enfranchisement of their properties, but 75% of building consisted of a shop, and only 25% … WebThe Court of Appeal reviewed a number of authorities on the meaning of “house”, including Lake v Bennett [1970] 1 Q.B. 663, Tandon v Trustees of Spurgeons Homes [1982] AC 755, Boss Holdings Ltd v Grosvenor West End Properties Ltd [2008] 1 WLR 289 and (most recently) Grosvenor Estates Ltd v Prospect Estates Ltd [2009] WLR 1313 (where the ... robert in urban dictionary
So you think you know what a house is - simkins.com
http://www.newsontheblock.com/news-opinion/court-of-appeal-rules-apartment-above-shops-is-a-house WebDec 1, 2015 · Originally, in Tandon v Trustees of Spurgeon’s Homes the House of Lords decided that a property in such a situation can be enfranchised. However, in Henley v Cohen the Court of Appeal decided that such a property could not be enfranchised. WebNov 1, 2024 · Cited – Tandon v Trustees of Spurgeons Homes HL 1982 Tenants sought enfranchisement of their properties, but 75% of building consisted of a shop, and only 25% was living accomodation. Held: The tenants were entitled to buy the freehold. The question whether a building is a house ‘reasonably so . . robert in strictly